.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Total Pageviews

Powered by Blogger.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

zac efron 2011 fat

zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 fat,
  • zac efron 2011 fat,



  • brayhite
    Apr 25, 01:59 PM
    I'm not from the US so if someone with some legal background over there could point out to me how this would work..? Where I'm from you have to have suffered damages in order to sue someone, otherwise a government regulator would just impose a fine on the company or require them to stop what they are doing..? How have these people (who are suing apple) suffered losses as a result of this apparent spying technology..?

    IANAL, but AFAIK, here in America, having rights infringed upon is reason for sueing. That, in itself, is a "damage". Hence why Apple is being sued. They apparently are infringing upon the consumers' rights to privacy.





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 calendar
  • zac efron 2011 calendar



  • grum
    Sep 19, 08:11 AM
    It gets annoying. Why? Because it's true and most people don't want to admit it.

    In a few cases here and there, the extra processor power/speed is going to help. But for a majority of people buying a MacBook, they're not going to be burning home-made DVD's, doing intense Music compositions, or using it for hard-core gaming. They're going to SURF and WRITE.

    As for the "resale" value, again, most people who are buying a used MacBook are NOT going to ask "is it a Merom?" They're going to ask how nice the case is, how much use it's gotten, and how much it is, and that's it.

    Everybody likes to play "ooo, I'm the hard-core computing whiz and I need the BEST out there", but I bet you if you took an honest poll out there of everyone who's answered this thread, you'd find at least 75% these Apple fans have no need for for the extra speed, they just want it because it's "cool" and "fast" and it's the latest thing out there.

    You may be right to a certain extent, but l i assumed that most people who want a Macbook Pro are going to be using it for intensive stuff - I was under the impressions that Macs are the platform of choice for a lot of graphics professionals etc so the high end line would have a lot of those kind of ppl buying. Granted the difference in speed will probably be fairly minimal, but when you are spending a load of cash on a top-of-the line notebook, why shouldnt you expect to have the latest and greatest technology available? It also seems quite likely they might either make them cheaper, or offer more RAM on the base model etc. so buying now unless you really have to seems foolish.

    Im also not sure about your point on the resale value, i would imagine pro users probably would be concerned about which processor it had in it.





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011. photos
  • zac efron 2011. photos



  • fastlane1588
    Aug 5, 05:35 PM
    iMac - No.
    iPod - No.
    MacBook - No.
    MacBook Pro - No.
    MacPro - Yes.
    Xserve - Yes.
    Displays - Yes.
    Leopard Preview - Yes.
    iPhone - Ha ha ha ha ha ha.




    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron fat
  • zac efron fat



  • Legion93
    Apr 6, 03:34 PM
    Perfect day for this news....

    I have a new 13" MBA sitting here at my desk unopened...just dropped off from FedEx today. I'm debating whether or not to just return it and wait for the refresh or be happy with what I got.

    I'm a very light user..web, email, iTunes, sync iPhone and iPad. Do I really need the Sandy Bridge power..probably not but I dont want to have the "old not so shiny ball" come June (as the rumors suggest).

    Any help from the MR community is greatly appreciated!

    Don't get your hopes up, as any rumour is just a speculation. Apple may or may not release any updated version of the MBA very soon, but it can all depend. If you really want power, you could sell your Air for a MBP, which came out only couple months ago.





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 calendar
  • zac efron 2011 calendar



  • princealfie
    Nov 29, 01:22 AM
    You my friend, sound like a socialist...

    I'm a Poststructuralistmarxist so perhaps that will help you guys out :cool:





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 body.
  • zac efron 2011 body.



  • BaldiMac
    Mar 22, 02:52 PM
    I wasn't thinking straight, big deal.

    And Thankfully I'm more successful in life than you'll ever be. Thanks.

    I guess that's as close to an apology as one can expect on this forum.





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 hair.
  • zac efron 2011 hair.



  • SiliconAddict
    Aug 7, 07:50 PM
    Not very innovative so-far. The Intel change took the OS's soul and the inspiration.


    Give me a fracking break. Intel has NOTHING to do with this. NOTHING. I wish PPC fanbois would just give it up. Soon they will be claiming that ozone depletion is due too Intel chips.

    does upgrading to leopard cost money for tiger users?


    Yes.





    zac efron 2011 fat. 2011 golden globes zac efron
  • 2011 golden globes zac efron



  • Enigmac
    Aug 7, 03:31 PM
    Not a glimpse of the Finder...! :eek:
    *cough* TOP SECRET *cough* :rolleyes:





    zac efron 2011 fat. 2011 golden globes zac efron
  • 2011 golden globes zac efron



  • cozart
    Jul 31, 12:00 PM
    so i'm having a difficult time deciding what to do.

    North Carolina's sales tax holiday is this coming weekend, just a couple of days before WWDC (of course!). i had every intention of buying a MacBook Pro during the holiday, but now i have no idea what to do.

    assuming there's not a silent release of an updated MBP tomorrow...

    will waiting be worth losing the 7.5% (somewhere between $150 and $200 depending on how i customize it) that i'll have to pay if i don't get it during the holiday?

    should i go ahead and get it during tax free weekend in case there's not even an announcement at WWDC? or, if there is an announcement, should i go ahead and get it and then return it within the 14-day window, losing the 10% restocking fee.

    so many options and this first-time mac buyer doesn't know what to do!





    zac efron 2011 fat. bulking Zac+efron+fat+2011
  • bulking Zac+efron+fat+2011



  • swingerofbirch
    Nov 28, 07:22 PM
    This would be like Ford paying Exxon a fee because some car drivers syphon gas....pretty weird!





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 calendar. zac
  • zac efron 2011 calendar. zac



  • iJohnHenry
    Mar 19, 05:52 PM
    It's a known fact the Obama Administration monitors MacRumors forums for a populist read on issues... ;)

    OMG. I guess I should not have deleted those White House E-mails as spam. :eek:





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 calendar.
  • zac efron 2011 calendar.



  • mr.steevo
    Apr 28, 04:51 PM
    This thread is Still rattling on about this?

    The Titanic is still sinking...





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 body.
  • zac efron 2011 body.



  • JMies419
    Aug 26, 08:21 PM
    On the day that the MBP's with merom go on sale, I wonder WHAT TIME Apples website will change and display the new products? :confused:





    zac efron 2011 fat. And I thought Zac Efron was
  • And I thought Zac Efron was



  • milo
    Jul 27, 11:55 AM
    so cn you put it in a mb too?

    mini and iMac can be upgraded, they have a socket.

    MB and MPB can not (at least not do it yourself), they are soldered.





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 body. abril de
  • zac efron 2011 body. abril de



  • Moyank24
    Apr 27, 12:08 PM
    I lost mine a few years ago and it was re-issued so it isn't worn and faded. Does that mean I can't run for president? :eek::p

    Yes.

    Actually, we're going to have to ask you to leave the country. You and your fake birth certificate aren't welcome here.





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 golden globes.
  • zac efron 2011 golden globes.



  • animatedude
    Apr 6, 12:27 PM
    the article doesn't mention when these wil be released.





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 shirtless.
  • zac efron 2011 shirtless.



  • marksman
    Mar 31, 09:09 PM
    I neither agree or disagree with this statement, I'm just very curious as to whether or not it is true. Anyone have an data that can prove/disprove this?

    I have just tried to find some information on this, and the only information I can find are two seperate quarters where a blackberry phone was number 1 for that particular quarter. The 3G was second in that quarter. In another instance, Blackberry was #1 for a quarter, and the 3GS was #2 and the 3G was #4.

    There is a lack of data actually listing the top selling individual smartphones out there.

    The interesting thing is I suspect the other top selling phones are all Blackberry devices. Maybe the Droid would be in there, but I suspect if you did a top 10 only one android device would be there.





    zac efron 2011 fat. zac efron 2011 calendar
  • zac efron 2011 calendar



  • osofast240sx
    Apr 8, 07:56 AM
    I work at Best Buy, and I can tell you this "rumor" is not true.

    First, we do not have daily quotas on iPad sales, although we do have overall budget goals as any company would. iPads had no impact on this.

    iPad 2's have been extremely hard to keep in stock, and at least for my store and all the stores in my region, they would sell out within hours of receiving a pretty good sized shipment. (Although the Verizon ones dont sell as well as others, they still sell out too) We did not hold anything back... do you think we like the hundreds of calls and dozens of people asking us if we have any in stock? We took care of every customer we could. In checking inventory levels at other stores, it was zero's all the way down the list.

    We are experiencing inventory issues with the iPad. Be it simple unexpected demand, the earthquake in Japan, or Apple wanting to take care of customers through their website and retail store before big box stores... I dont know. But stores certainly are not sitting on them.what you(Best Buy) did was take $100 from the customer and lock them in from buying anywere else!





    zac efron 2011 fat. ZAC EFRON 2011 HAIRCUT
  • ZAC EFRON 2011 HAIRCUT



  • mustangs
    Sep 19, 12:00 AM
    I purchased my 1.83GHz Mac Book with 1GHz of RAM on Sep 07, and apple sent me an email that it was going to be shipped on the 18th. Today I got this email from Apple "




    Super Dave
    Aug 6, 12:04 AM
    P.S. How about seamless MSN/Yahoo! Messenger support in iChat?

    I would LOVE if that happened, but there's no evidence of it other than that I daydream about it.

    David :cool:





    samcraig
    Apr 27, 10:08 AM
    revelated, beware! Apple is closing in on you with their black helicopters and vans to take you prisoner for mind control experiments.

    OR

    If they did this on purpose, maybe they wanted to know why so many people complain about AT&T in certain parts of SF. Or maybe they wanted to know how many users access Internet via all the Starbucks in the world? Maybe they wanted to direct ads at you based upon your location.
    All of the above are already being done to you via many other avenues, e.g. your frequent buyer cards, ATMs, CCs, etc.

    BUT

    If you want to believe there is some BIGGER MYSTERIOUS PURPOSE in mind for them to do this, you go right own. LOOK OUT BEHIND YOU - WAS THAT A BLACK UNMARKED VAN!!!! :D

    And maybe purging or limiting this DB won't slow location service based apps/etc either.

    It goes both ways.

    In fact - if purging this data WAS going to cause a performance issue - do you really think Apple would do it? They aren't exactly the type to sacrifice quality, are they?





    G5power
    Jul 27, 09:48 AM
    Assuming August 7 as an announcement date of new systems, the waiting is killer.





    yoak
    Apr 12, 04:18 AM
    The insufficient content shouldn't pop up at random, or there is a bug. It pops up when there is insufficient content for a transition. Some transitions like crossfade are centered at the end/starting point of a clip. So it expands past/before this point, hence the need of additional content in the file.

    I didn't know about that multicore issue with Compressor when launched directly from the timeline. I suspect an issue with your setup. Compressor does make good use of my 4 cores on mpeg2 and I never set up Qmaster.

    What Mac are you using?
    When I installed FSC3 I had to set up Qmaster to make Compressor use all my cores. It was not easy to make it work, but that was due to the bug that don�t allow you to send directly from FC. This is what took me a while to find out.
    We still had some problems making a new Mac Pro making use of all it�s core just this winter.

    Have you checked your BAtch Monitor to make sure Compressor really splits up the file and spread it out over all your cores?

    For the content bug, I�m not sure it�s a bug. I do know that it comes up when a file is too short for dissolve etc, but sometimes I can�t figure out why it comes up. Could still be my own fault, maybe I presumed it was a bug too easily





    ezekielrage_99
    Jul 27, 10:04 PM
    This was one of the advantages of the G5 but IBM stalled and Intel has essentially blown past everybody. AMD will answer no doubt, but it appears that Intel has about a 6 month jump on them.

    AMD has it's hands full with an ATi take over which gives Intel the chance to get a bit a head on the Processor game. Either way it's good Intel has some real competition it means faster cheaper chips.:cool: